Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

View/ Open
Date
2013Author
Leung, B.
Roura-Pascual, N.
Bacher, S.
Heikkila, J.
Brotons, L.
Burgman, M.A.
Dehnen-Schmutz, K.
Essl, F.
Hulme, P.E.
Richardson, D.M.
Sol, D.
Vila, M.
Format Extent
108993 bytesMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why
TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.
Collections
- RESEARCH: Richardson D [345]