• Login
    View Item 
    •   CIB Repository
    • CORE TEAM RESEARCH OUTPUTS
    • RESEARCH: Richardson D
    • View Item
    •   CIB Repository
    • CORE TEAM RESEARCH OUTPUTS
    • RESEARCH: Richardson D
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Richardson_Ecol_Lett_2013.pdf (106.4Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Leung, B.
    Roura-Pascual, N.
    Bacher, S.
    Heikkila, J.
    Brotons, L.
    Burgman, M.A.
    Dehnen-Schmutz, K.
    Essl, F.
    Hulme, P.E.
    Richardson, D.M.
    Sol, D.
    Vila, M.
    Format Extent
    108993 bytes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1421
    Collections
    • RESEARCH: Richardson D [345]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of CIB RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Date CreatedThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Date Created

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback